چالش های شکل دهی شبکه همکاری مهندسی شده (مطالعه موردی شبکه همکاری شرکت پویندگان راه سعادت)

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 دانشگاه تهران

3 پژوهشکده مطالعات بنیادین علم و فناوری ، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی ، تهران، ایران

4 پژوهشکده مطالعات فناوری، تهران، ایران

چکیده

در سالیان گذشته مطالعات بسیاری بر روی شبکه‌های همکاری انجام‌شده، بااین‌وجود روند تکامل و آفرینش شبکه، در تعداد کمی از تحقیقات موردتوجه قرارگرفته است. در این میان شناسایی و تحلیل جامع چالش‌های موجود در روند تشکیل شبکه، باهدف حل آن‌ها و پایدارسازی شبکه از اهمیت بسیاری برخوردار است. در این پژوهش یک شبکه همکاری فعال در زمینه تجهیزات پزشکی که در سال ۱۳۸۸ هسته اولیه آن به‌صورت مهندسی‌شده ایجاد گردید و متشکل از اعضای متنوع می‌باشد، موردمطالعه قرار گرفت. حضور اعضای متنوع در شبکه، زمینه‌ساز بروز چالش‌های مختلف است و امکان ارائه تحلیل مقایسه‌ای بین آن‌ها را به وجود می‌آورد. جهت تجزیه‌وتحلیل‌ فرآیندمحور و غنی اطلاعات جمع‌آوری‌شده از مصاحبه‌های عمیق و اسناد پشتیبان، از رویکرد کیفی و مطالعه موردی استفاده شد. درنهایت ضمن تحلیل ساختار و چارچوب شبکه، 4 مدل همکاری و 28 چالش مختلف در شبکه شناسایی گردید و چالش­های شناسایی‌شده (بر اساس وجود و یا عدم وجود آن‌ها در هر یک از 4 مدل همکاری شناسایی‌شده) به 7 دسته، تقسیم‌بندی گردیدند و مورد تحلیل قرار گرفتند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying and analyzing challenges of forming of the engineered collaboration network (a Case study of collaboration network of Poyandeghan Rah Saadat)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hashem Moazzez 1
  • Mohammad Torabi Khargh 2
  • Hadi Nilforoushan 3
  • Seyed Mohammad Sahebkar Khorasani 4
1 Assistant Professor at University of Tehran
2 University of Tehran
3 Assistant Professor at Shahid Beheshti University
4 Assistant Professor at Technology Studies Institute
چکیده [English]

In recent years, many studies have been conducted on collaboration networks, however, the process of evolution and network creation has been considered in a small number of studies. In this context, comprehensive identification and analysis of the challenges in the network forming process are important in order to solve them and to stabilize the network. In this research, an active collaboration network in the field of medical equipment that engineered by a Hub in 2009 and consisting of a large company, a small and medium-sized company, two subcontractors, three universities, a start-up, an accelerator and a venture capital fund, was studied. The presence of diverse members in the network is the basis for the emergence of various challenges and allows for a comparative analysis between them. For process-centric and rich analyze of information that gathered from deep interviews and supporting documents, a qualitative approach and case study were used. Finally, after analyzing the structure and framework of the network, 4 collaboration models and 28 different challenges were identified in the network, and in order to provide an analysis, those 28 different challenges (based on their existence or absence in each of the 4 identified collaboration models) divided into 7 categories and analyzed

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Technological collaboration
  • engineered collaboration network
  • Network forming
  • Collaboration challenges
  • Medical Equipment
  • case study

Akdoğan, A.A. & Cingšz, A., 2012. An Empirical Study on Determining the Attitudes of Small and Medium Sized Businesses (SMEs) Related to Coopetition. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, pp.252–258.

Al-Tabbaa, O. & Ankrah, S., 2016. Social capital to facilitate ‘engineered’ university–industry collaboration for technology transfer: A dynamic perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104, pp.1–15.

Ansari, M.F., Kharb, R.K., Luthra, S., Shimmi, S.L. & Chatterji, S., 2013. Analysis of barriers to implement solar power installations in India using interpretive structural modeling technique. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 27, pp.163–174.

Asadifard, R., Tabatabaeian, S.H., Sofi, J.B. & Taghva, M.R., 2017. A model for investigating the stability factors in formal science and technology collaborative networks: A case study of Iran. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 122, pp.139–150.

Birkinshaw, J., Bessant, J. & Delbridge, R., 2007. Finding, Forming, and Performing: Creating Networks for Discontinuous Innovation. California Management Review, 49(3), pp.67–84.

Boyatzis, R.E., 1998. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. sage.

Chang, S.-H., 2017. The technology networks and development trends of university-industry collaborative patents. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,118, pp.107–113.

Chen, K., 2017. Do research institutes benefit from their network positions in research collaboration networks with industries or / and universities ? Technovation, (October), pp.1–20.

COY, S.P., SHIPLEY, M.F., OMER, K. & KHAN, R.N.A., 2007. FACTORS CONTRIBUTORY TO SUCCESS: A STUDY OF PAKISTAN’S SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 12(02), pp.181–198.

Creswell, J.W., 1998. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. thousand oaks, ca: Sage.

Darabi, F. & Clark, M., 2012. Developing business school/SMEs collaboration: the role of trust. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 18(4), pp.477–493.

Etemad, H., Wright, R.W. & Dana, L.P., 2001. Symbiotic international business networks: collaboration between small and large firms. Thunderbird International Business Review, 43(4), pp.481–499.

Evans, P. & Wolf, B., 2005. Collaboration Rules. Harvard Business Review, (JULY–AUGUST).

Fernández-Olmos, M. & Ramírez-Alesón, M., 2017. How internal and external factors influence the dynamics of SME technology collaboration networks over time. Technovation, 64–65(July 2016), pp.16–27.

Fiaz, M. & Naiding, Y., 2012. Exploring the Barriers to R&D Collaborations: A Challenge for Industry and Faculty for Sustainable U-I Collaboration Growth. International Journal of U- & E-Service, Science & Technology, 5(2), pp.1–15.

Fung, H.-N. & Wong, C.-Y., 2017. Scientific collaboration in indigenous knowledge in context: Insights from publication and co-publication network analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, pp.57–69.

Hanna, V. & Walsh, K., 2008. Interfirm Cooperation among Small Manufacturing Firms. International Small Business Journal, 26(3), pp.299–321.

Hemetsberger, A. & Reinhardt, C., 2009. Collective Development in Open-Source Communities: An Activity Theoretical Perspective on Successful Online Collaboration. Organization Studies, 30(9), pp.987–1008.

Hoang, H. & Antoncic, B., 2003. Network-based research in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), pp.165–187.

Hyötyläinen, R., Valkokari, K. & Kalliokoski, P., 2011. Renewal Through Co-Creation in Business Networks. The Open Source Business Resource, (October 2016), pp.29–37.

Inkpen, A.C. & Tsang, E.W.K., 2005. SOCIAL CAPITAL, NETWORKS, AND KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), pp.146–165.

Jack, S.L., 2010. Approaches to studying networks: Implications and outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), pp.120–137.

Johanson, M. & Lundberg, H., 2011. Network Strategies for Regional Growth. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Kapucu, N. & Garayev, V., 2013. Designing, Managing, and Sustaining Functionally Collaborative Emergency Management Networks. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(3), pp.312–330.

Karlsson, J., Booth, S. & Odenrick, P., 2007. Academics’ Strategies and Obstacles in Achieving Collaboration between Universities and SMEs. Tertiary Education and Management, 13(3), pp.187–201.

Kshetri, N. & Schiopu, A., 2007. Government Policy, Continental Collaboration and the Diffusion of Open Source Software in China, Japan, & South Korea. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 8(1), pp.61–77.

Lindman, J. & Rajala, R., 2012. How Open Source Has Changed the Software Industry : Perspectives from Open Source Entrepreneurs. technology Innovation Management Review, (January), pp.5–11.

Mohr, J. & Spekman, R., 2016. Characteristics of Partnership Success : Partnership Attributes , Communication Behavior , and Conflict Resolution Techniques Author ( s ): Jakki Mohr and Robert Spekman Published by : Wiley Stable URL : http://www.jstor.org/stable/2486868 Accessed : 13-0. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), pp.135–152.

Muegge, S., 2013. Platforms , Communities , and Business Ecosystems : Lessons Learned about Technology Entrepreneurship in an Interconnected World Platforms , Communities , and Business Ecosystems. Technology Innovation Management Review, (February), pp.5–15.

Muscio, A., 2007. THE IMPACT OF ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY ON SMEs’ COLLABORATION. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(8), pp.653–668.

Nan, N. & Kumar, S., 2013. Joint effect of team structure and software architecture in open source software development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 60(3), pp.592–603.

Provan, K.G., Fish, A., Sydow, J. & Fish, A., 2007. Interorganizational Networks at the Network Level A Review of the Empirical Literature on Whole Networks. Journal of Management, 33(3), pp.479–516.

Rajalo, S. & Vadi, M., 2017. University-industry innovation collaboration: Reconceptualization. Technovation, 62–63(April), pp.42–54.

Ramesh, A., Banwet, D.K. & Shankar, R., 2010. Modeling the barriers of supply chain collaboration. Journal of Modelling in Management, 5(2), pp.176–193

Richbell, S.M., 2006. Owner-managers and Business Planning in the Small Firm. International Small Business Journal, 24(5), pp.496–514.

Riemer, K. & Klein, S., n.d. Network Management Framework. In: Managing Dynamic Networks. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp.17–66.

Sarker, S., Sarker, S. & Schneider, C., 2009. Seeing Remote Team Members as Leaders: A Study of US-Scandinavian Teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 52(1), pp.75–94.

Scaringella, L. & Burtschell, F., 2017. The challenges of radical innovation in Iran: Knowledge transfer and absorptive capacity highlights — Evidence from a joint venture in the construction sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 122, pp.151–169.

Schøtt, T. & Jensen, K.W., 2016. Firms’ innovation benefiting from networking and institutional support: A global analysis of national and firm effects. Research Policy, 45(6), pp.1233–1246.

Shalbaf, R., Behnam, H. & Jelveh Moghadam, H., 2015. Monitoring depth of anesthesia using combination of EEG measure and hemodynamic variables. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 9(1), pp.41–51.

Shalbaf, R., Behnam, H., Sleigh, J.W., Steyn-Ross, A. & Voss, L.J., 2013. Monitoring the depth of anesthesia using entropy features and an artificial neural network. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 218(1), pp.17–24.

Shalbaf, R., Mehrnam, A.H. & Behnam, H., 2014. Depth of anesthesia indicator using combination of complexity and frequency measures. In: 2014 21th Iranian Conference on Biomedical Engineering (ICBME). IEEE, pp.156–160.

Shamsuzzoha, A., Kankaanpaa, T., Carneiro, L.M., Almeida, R., Chiodi, A. & Fornasiero, R., 2013. Dynamic and collaborative business networks in the fashion industry. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 26(1–2), pp.125–139.

Shane, S. & Venkataraman, S., 2000. The Promise of Enterpreneurship as a Field of Research. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), p.217.

Skerrett, I., 2011. Best Practices in Multi-Vendor Open Source Communities. Open Source Business Resource, (January 2011), pp.11–15.

Smith, D., Alshaikh, A., Bojan, R., Kak, A. & Kohe, J.M., 2014. Overcoming Barriers to Collaboration in an Open Source Ecosystem. Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(January), pp.18–27.

Strauss, A. & Corbin, J., 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Procedures and techniques for developing grounded theory. ed: Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Tidd, J. & Bessant, J., 2009. Managing innovation integrating technological, market and organizational change. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

Tsai, K.H., 2009. Collaborative networks and product innovation performance: Toward a contingency perspective. Research Policy, 38(5), pp.765–778.

TURRINI, A., CRISTOFOLI, D., FROSINI, F. & NASI, G., 2009. NETWORKING LITERATURE ABOUT DETERMINANTS OF NETWORK EFFECTIVENESS. Public Administration, 88(2), pp.528–550.

Vangen, S. & Huxham, C., 2003. Nurturing Collaborative Relations. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(1), pp.5–31.

Verschoore, J.R. & Balestrin, A., 2011. Outcomes in Small-Firm Networks: A Quantitative Study in the Southern Brazilian Context.

Wang, H., Peverelli, P.J. & Bossink, B.A.G., 2014. The development of asymmetric trust in cooperation between large firms and SMEs: Insights from china. Group Decision and Negotiation, 24(5), pp.925–947.

Yih‐Tong Sun, P. & Scott, J.L., 2005. An investigation of barriers to knowledge transfer. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(2), pp.75–90.

Yin, R.K., 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Applied Social Research Methods. SAGE Publications.

اسدی فرد, ر.، چوخانی زاده مقدم, ا. و گودرزی, م.، 1395. الگویی برای دسته‌بندی و مطالعه عوامل مؤثر بر موفقیت شبکه‌های همکاری بین‌المللی. مدیریت نوآوری، دوره 5، شماره 1، صص 150-129.

محمدی, م.، حمیدی, م.، محمودی, ب. و جوادی, س.، 1393. شناسایی، تحلیل و دسته‌بندی عوامل مؤثر بر شکل‌گیری شبکه‌های نوآوری در شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان (مطالعه موردی پارک علم و فناوری دانشگاه تهران). مدیریت نوآوری، دوره 3، شماره 4، صص 24-1.