A Model for Classification and Study of Success Factors in International Collaborative Networks

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Technology Studies Institute Iran

2 Iran Nanotechnology Initiative Council

3 Allame Tabatabaei University

Abstract

Collaborative networking has been considered as a key policy tool in the last decades in the field of science and technology (S&T). Therefore, S&T policymakers and managers needed to know the measures affecting the success and failure of these networks. Four S&T networks of Islamic countries — created under the supervision of Organization of Islamic Cooperation's (OIC) Standing Committee on Scientific and Technological Cooperation (COMSTECH) — are the cases of this study. Using a qualitative survey and multiple case study method, we collect relevant data through in-depth interviews with key informants, observation, and review of archived documents. In this study, 24 success factors of regional/international S&T collaborative networks are identified and categorized by developing a conceptual model. These factors are divided to two main endogenous and exogenous groups. The results reveal that besides the general success factors of all networks, there are some specific factors playing important roles in each network that need to be addressed.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Anklam, p., 2007. Net Work: a Practical Guide to Creating and Sustaining Networks at Work and in the World. USA: Butterworth–Heinemann publication.
Asadi Fard, R., 2011. A model for the formation of sustainable networks of science and technology cooperation in Iran. Tehran, School of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i University (RA).
Bianchi, P. & Bellini, N., 1991. Public policies for local networks of innovators. Research Policy, Volume 20, pp. 487-497.
Brannback, M., 2003. R&D collaboration: role of Ba in knowledge-creating networks. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Volume 1, pp. 28-38.
Buchel, B. & Raub, S., 2002. Building knowledge-creating value networks. European Management Journal, 20(6), pp. 587-596.
Ceglie, G. & Dini, M., 1999. SME Cluster and Network Development in Developing Countries: The Experience of UNlDO, s.l.: United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO).
Cohen, W. & Levinthal, D., 1990. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, Volume 35, pp. 128–52.
COMSTECH, 2012. COMSTECH website. [Online] Available at: http://comstech.org/iinetworks.aspx. [Accessed 25 11 2013].
Danilovic, M. & Winroth, M., 2005. A tentative framework for analyzing integration in collaborative Manufacturing network settings: a Cass study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Volume 22, pp. 141-58.
DeBreeson, C. & Amesse, F., 1991. Networks of innovators: A review and introduction to the issue. Research Policy, Volume 20, pp. 363-379.
Enkel, E., 2010. Attributes required for profiting from open innovation in networks. International Journal of Technology Management, 52(3-4), pp. 344-371.
Enkel, E. & Gassmann, O., 2006. Determinants of Innovation Networks: The Case of the European Innovation Network for radiation Dosimitry. [Online] Available at: http://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/EXPORT/DL/20409.pdf [Accessed 03 01 2011].
Freeman, C., 1991. Networks of Innovators: A Synthesis of Research Issues. Research Policy, Volume 20, pp. 499- 514.
Hagedoorn, J., 2002. Inter-Firm R&D Partnerships: An Overview of Major Trends and Patterns since 1960. Research Policy, Volume 31, pp. 477– 92.
Hakansson, H., 1989. Corporate Technological Behaviour: Cooperation and Networks. London: Routledge.
Hoang, H. & Antoncic, B., 2003. Network-based research in entrepreneurship: a critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, Volume 18, pp. 165–187.
Humphrey, J. & Schmitz, H., 1995. Principles for Promoting Clusters and Networks of SMEs, UNlDO.
Jack, S. & Anderson, A., 2002. The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(5), pp. 467– 487.
Jackson, M. & Wolinsky, A., 1996. A strategic Model of social and economic networks. Journal of Economic Theory, Volume 71, pp. 44-74.
Mathison, S., 1988. Why triangulate?. Educational Researcher, 17(2), pp. 13-17.
Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E. & Silverman, B. S., 1996. Strategic Alliances and Inter-firm Knowledge Transfer. Strategic Management Journal, Volume 17, pp. 77– 91.
Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H., 2005. The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.
Patton, M., 2002. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 3rd ed., Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
PRO INNO EUROPE, 2008. Key lessons in fostering transnational cooperation in support for innovation in Europe, INNO-LEARNING PLATFORM.
Provan, K. G. & Milward, H. B., 1995. A Preliminary Theory of Inter-organizational Network Effectiveness: A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), pp. 1-33.
Salines, M., 2010. Success Factors of Macro-Regional Cooperation: The Example of the Baltic Sea Region. European Political and Administrative Studies, Issue 12.
Stenbacka, C., 2001. Qualitative research requires quality concepts of its own. Management Decision, 39(7), pp. 551-555.
Szarka, J., 1990. Networking and Small Firms. International Small Business Journal, 8(2), pp. 10- 22.
Teece, D., 1990. Innovation and the Organization of Industry, Berkeley: Consortium on Competitiveness and Cooperation.
Tripsas, M., Schrader, S. & Sobrero, M., 1995. Discouraging opportunistic behaviors collaborative R&D: A new role for government. Research Policy, Volume 24, pp. 367-389.
Wixted, B. & Holbrook, J., 2008. Conceptual issues in the evaluation of formal research networks, CPROST Report.
Yin, R., 2003. Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage publication, Inc..
 

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 14 December 2015
  • Accept Date: 22 August 2016

Share

How to cite

Statistics