Proposing a Process-Based Approach to Technology Planning at Supra-Corporation Level

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 University of Tehran

2 Shaif University of Technology

3 University of tehran

Abstract

Competitive challenges have made it a critical need for industries to identify and choose enabling future technologies. Furthermore, the importance of defining direction for industry and the necessity of prioritizing technological investments in different subsectors demonstrate the significance of technology planning at industry level. Reviewing the literature of technology planning at industry level shows that the methodologies employed in most studies are either extended methods of technology planning at firm level or are resulted from a change in the frameworks of technology policy at national level. In this paper, by adopting a qualitative approach and grounded theory method and using semi-structured interviews with 40 academic and industrial experts in the field of oil & gas, auto-making and aerospace, we present a three-level model for technology planning at industry level. At the reference level of the model, the main guidelines of technology development are chosen, and at the portfolio level, technology areas portfolios that best meet the main requirements of the system are defined. At the option level of the model, the technology options that have the potential to reach the desired functional goals are selected. At the end and after an analysis of the extended model, recommendations for further research are presented.

Keywords

References

[1]- Arasti, M. Ghafarzadegan, M. Peymankhah, S. Pak Seresht, S. “Road Map Toolkit for Policymaking and Integrated Planning at the Industry Level: A Case Study of the Roadmap for Iran's Gas Industry Technology at 14040 horizons”, R & D Commercialization Conference, Tehran, Iran,2010.
 [2] Phaal, “Foresight vehicle technology roadmap, technology and research direction for future road vehicles” London: Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders Ltd, 2004.
[3] Bray, O.H. Garcia, M.L."Technology road mapping: the integration of strategic and technology planning for competitiveness" The Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), 1997.
[4] Craig, P.P. Gadgil, A. Koomey, J.G. “What can history teach us? A retrospective examination of long-term energy forecasts for the United States” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 27, pp. 83–118, 2002.
[5] Elzen, B. Geels, F.W. Hofman, P.S.” Sociotechnical scenarios (STSc): development and evaluation of a new methodology to explore transitions towards a sustainable energy supply” Report for NWO/NOVEM, No. 014-28-211, University of Twente, Enschede, 2002.
[6] Heijungs, R. Huijbregts, M.A.J. “A review of approaches to treat uncertainties in LCA”  In: Pahl-Wostl, C. Schmidt, S. Rizzoli, A.E. Jakeman, A.J., Complexity and Integrated Resources Management, Transactions of the 2nd Biennial Meeting of the International Environmental Modeling and Software Society, pp. 332-339 , 2004.
[7] Benders, R.M.J. Wilting, H.C. Kramer, K.J. Moll, H.C.”Description and application of the EAP computer program for calculating life-cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of household consumption items” International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 15 (2), pp.171–182, 2001.
[8] Kok, R. Benders, R.M.J. Moll, H.C. ”Energie-intensiteiten van de Nederlandse consumptieve  bestedingen anno 1996 (Energy intensities of the Dutch consumptive purchases in 1996)” Center for Energy and Environmental Studies (IVEM), University of Groningen, Groningen ,2001.
[9] Van Beeck, N. “Classification of energy models. Research Memorandum” Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Tilburg University, 1999.
[10] Geels, F. W. "Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study" Research Policy, 31(8-9), pp. 1257-1274, 2002.
[11] Porter, M. “TheCompetitive Advantage of Nations" The Free Press, New York,1990.
[12] Hua, R.L. Khalil,T. “Technology management in china: a global perspective and challenging issues”  Technology management in china, 1(1), pp. 9−25, 2003.
[13] Shih, H.Y.  Chang, P.L. " Industrial innovation networks in Taiwan and China: A comparative analysis" Technology in Society, 31(2), pp. 176-186, 2009.
[14] Ching-Chiang Yeh, Pao-Long Chang "The Taiwan system of innovation in the tool machine industry: a case study" Engineering Technology Management, 20(4), pp. 367 – 380, 2003.
[15] Dodgsona, M. Mathewsb, J. Kastelle,T. Mei-Chih Huc," The evolving nature of Taiwan’s national innovation system:The case of  biotechnology innovation networks" Research Policy, 37(3), pp. 430–447, 2008.
[16] Mowery, D. "Nanotechnology and the US national innovation system: continuity and change"Technology transfer, 36(6), pp697-711, 2011.
[17] Moosup Jung, Lee, K. " Sectoral systems of innovation and productivity catch-up: determinants of the productivity gap between Korean and Japanese firms" Industrial & Corporation Change, 19(4), pp. 1037–1069, 2010.
[18] Oltra,V. Jean, M.S. "Sectoral systems of environmental innovation: An application to the French automotive industry" Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 76(4), pp. 567–583, 2009.
[19] Ting-Lin Lee, Tunzelmann, N.V. " A dynamic analytic approach to national innovation systems: The IC industry in Taiwan" Research Policy, 34(4), pp. 425-440, 2005.
[20] Amer, M. Daim, T. U. "Technological Forecasting & Social Change Application of technology roadmaps for renewable energy sector" Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 77(8), pp. 1355-1370, 2010.
[21] Lee, S. Kang, S. Park, Ye. Park, Yo. "Technology road mapping for R & D planning: The case of the Korean parts and materials industry", Technovation, 27(8), pp. 433-445, 2007.
[22] Chang, P.L. Hsu, C.W. Tsai, C.T.  “A stage approach for industrial technology development and implementation—the case of Taiwan’s computer industry” Technovation, 19(4), pp.233-241, 1999.
[23] Ronde, P. "Delphi analysis of national specificities in selected innovative areas in Germany and France" Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 70(5), pp. 419–448, 2003.
[24]  Ronde, P." Technological clusters with a knowledge-based principle: evidence from a Delphi investigation in the French case of the life sciences" Research Policy, 30 (7), pp. 1041–1057, 2001.
[25] Albright, R.E. Kappel, T.A. "Road mapping in the corporation" Research Technology Management, 42 (2), pp. 31-40, 2003.
[26] Barker, D.D.J.H. Smith, D.J.H. "Technology foresight using roadmaps" Long Range Planning, 28(2), pp. 21-28, 1995.
[27] Groenveld, P. " Road mapping integrates business and technology" Research-Technology Management, 40(5), pp. 48-55, 1997.
[28] Garcia, M.L. Bray, O.H. “Fundamental of technology road mapping" SANDA-0665, Strategic Business Development department Sandia National Laboratories, 1997.
[29] Strauss, J. Radnor, M. Peterson, J. "Plotting and navigating a non-linear roadmap: knowledge-based road mapping for emerging and dynamic environments" The East Asian Conference on Knowledge Creation Management, Singapore, 1998.
[30] McMillan, A. "Road mapping – agent of change" Research Technology Management, 42 (2), pp. 40-47, 2003.
[31] Willyard, C.H. McClees, C.W. “Motorola’s technology roadmap process” Research Management, Sept.-Oct., pp. 13-19, 1987.
[32] Galvin, R."Science Roadmaps" Science, 280, 1998.
[33] Yong, G. Lee, Yong, S. “Selecting the key research areas in Nano-technology field using technology cluster analysis: A case study based on National R&D Programs in South Korea” Technovation, 27(1-2), pp. 57−64, 2007.
[34] Phaal, Probert  "Technology road mapping: facilitating collaborative research strategy" Cambridge University Press, 2009.
[35] OG21 "Norway's Technology Strategy for Value Creation on the NCS and Enhanced Competitiveness in the Oil and Gas Industry'' strategy document revised, 2006.
[36] U.S. Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy and the National Energy Technology Laboratory ''Natural Gas Infrastructure Reliability, Pathways for Enhanced Integrity, Reliability and Deliverability'' September, 2000.
[37]- Arasti, M. Bagheri Moghadam, N. Iran Khah, A. Hashemi, J. Radpoor, S. “Fuel Cell Technology and Hydrogen”, Elm and Adab Publications, 2008.
[38] Hoshangi, S. Arasti, M.R. Sahebzamani, S. "Crafting a methodology for formation R&D strategy based on evolutionary epistemology: case study of Iran power industry" EURMOT Conference of Technology Management, 2008.
[39]- Bagheri Moghadam, N. Emamian, M. “Project to determine the research priorities of the National Iranian Gas Company in the development and application of membrane technology in the gas industry”, National Iranian Gas Company, 2007.
[40]- Future Thinking Group of Tomorrow's Development Foundation "Technology Foresight Techniques”, Foundation for Development of Tomorrow, 2005.
[41]- Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology, “Country Research Priorities”, Council of Scientific Research of the Country, 2000.
 [42] Strauss, A.L. Corbin, J.M. " Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory" 2nd edition, California: Thousand Oaks, 1998.
 
Innovation Management Journal
Volume 2, Issue 2 - Serial Number 4
September 2013
Pages 99-120

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 27 April 2016
  • Accept Date: 27 April 2016

Share

How to cite

Statistics