تاثیر هماهنگی راهبردهای فناوری و بنگاه بر عملکرد بنگاه ها

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی

2 دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی

3 دانشگاه صنعتی مالک اشتر

چکیده

براساس منابع مدیریت و به ویژه منابع مدیریت فناوری، موفقیت بنگاه ها  به هماهنگی (یکپارچگی) راهبرد فناوری با راهبردهای بنگاه و کسب و کار بستگی دارد. اما سوالی که مطرح می شود این است که این هماهنگی چگونه برقرار می شود؟ بر اساس نظریه نقاط مرجع راهبردی، سازمان ها می توانند نقاط مرجعی را  برای هماهنگی انتخاب کنند و عناصر و سیستم های خود را با آن هماهنگ نمایند. با توجه به این نظریه، در صورتی که راهبردها براساس نقاط مرجع راهبردی یکسانی طراحی و اجرا شوند می توان انتظار داشت که با یکدیگر هماهنگ باشند. در این تحقیق میزان کنترل موجود در بنگاه و میزان توجه بنگاه به محیط بیرون به عنوان نقاط مرجع راهبردی انتخاب شدند و این فرضیه مطرح گردید که هماهنگی راهبردهای فناوری و بنگاه حول این نقاط مرجع می تواند به عملکرد بالاتر بنگاه منجر شود. این فرضیه از طریق پیمایش در 78 بنگاه صنعتی مورد بررسی قرارگرفت و مشخص شد که انواع خاصی از هماهنگی بین راهبرد فناوری و راهبرد بنگاه با عملکرد بالاتری همراه است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Technology Strategy Integration on Firms Performance

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyyed Mohammad A’a rabi 1
  • Bamdad Soofi 2
  • Jamshid Salehe Sadeghiani 2
  • Alireza Booshehri 3
1 Allame Tabatba’i University
2 Allame Tabatba’i University
3 Malekeashtar University of Technology
چکیده [English]

Based on management and particularly technology management literature, the success of a firm depends on the effective integration of its technology strategy in accordance with business and corporate-level strategies. The question is how this integration should be achieved. Based on the theory of strategic reference points (SRP), organizations can select reference points for integration and then integrate their elements and systems with them. However, to study several firms, the same reference points are needed. In this study, the control and focus of the firms are selected as strategic reference points and a hypothesis is raised that integrating technology and corporate strategies around these reference points can lead to higher performance. This hypothesis is tested in 78 defense-related firms, revealing that certain types of corporate and technology strategies integration are associated with higher performance.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • strategy
  • technology
  • Integration
  • performance
  • Strategic Reference Points
  • corporate strategy

1- Khalil, T. M. “Management of Technology: The Key to Competitiveness & Wealth Creation” USA: McGraw Hill, 2000.

2- Roberts, E.B. “Benchmarking the strategic management of technology-1” Research Technology Management, 38(1), pp.44-56, 1995.

3- Avison, D. Jones, J. Powell, P. & Wilson, D. “Using and validating the strategic alignment model” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 13(3), pp.223-246, 2004.

4- Lowe, P. “Management of Technology: Perception and Opportunities” London: Chapman & Hall, 1995. 

5- Berry, M.J. and Taggart, J.H. “Combining technology and corporate strategy in small high tech firms” Research Policy, 26, pp.883–895, 1998.

6- Chiesa، V. “R&D Strategy and Organization: Managing Technical Change in Dynamic Contexts” London, Imperial College Press, 2001.

7- Porter, M.E. “Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors” New York :The Free Press, 1980.

8- Porter, M.E. “Competitive Advantage” New York: The Free Press, 1985.

9- Hax, A.C. Majluf, N.S. ”Strategic Management: An Integrated Perspective” Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1984.

10- Hax, A.C. Majluf, N.S. “The Strategy Concept & Process: A Pragmatic Approach” Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1991.

11- Hax,  A.C. No, M. “Linking Technology and Business Strategies: A Methodological Approach and an Illustration” Working Paper, No. 3383-92BPS.,1992.

12- Little, A.D. “The Strategic Management of Technology, European Management Forum” Davos, 1981.

13- Roussel, p. Saad, K. Erickson, T.”Third Generation R&D” Boston: HBS Press, 1991.

14- Floyd, C. “Managing Technology for Corporate Success” Alders hot: Gower, 1997.

15- Booz-Allen and Hamilton “The Strategic Management of Technology” Outlook, Fall-Winter 1981.

16- Stacey, G.S. and Ashton, W.B. “A Structured Approach to Corporate Technology Strategy” International Journal of Technology Management, 5(4), pp. 389-407, 1990.

17- Burgelman, R.A. Madique, M.A. and Wheelwright, S.C. “Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation” Third Edition, McGraw-Hill, 2001.

18- Porter, M.E. “The Technological Dimension of Competitive Strategy, Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation” 1st Ed., Irwin, pp. 211-212, 1988.

19- Badawy, M. K. “Technology management education: alternative models” California Management Review, 40, pp.94-116, 1998.

20- Wild, R. “Technology and Management” Dubuque: Nichols Publishing Co, 1990.

21- De Wet, G. “Corporate Strategy and Technology Management: Creating the Interface” 5th International Conference in Management of Technology, Miami, pp.510-518, 1996.

22- Mitchell, G.R., 1995 (lecture notes). In Khalil, T.M. “Management of Technology - The key to competitiveness and wealth creation” USA: McGraw Hill, 2000.

23- Vernet, A. and Arasti, M.R. “Linking Business Strategy to Technology Strategies: A Prerequisite to the R&D Priorities Determination” International Journal of Technology Management, 18(3), pp. 293-307, 1999.

24- Arasti, M.R. and Vernet, A. “Business Process Reengineering: A systematic Approach to link Business Strategy and Technology Strategies” Proceeding of The Portland International Conference on Management Engineering, USA, Portland, 1997.

25- Tidd, J., Bessant, J. and Pavitt, K. "Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change" John Wiley & Sons, 2005.

26- Bambergger, P. and Moshlem, L. “HR strategy: compilation, implementation, control”, 1th Edition, Tehran: Publications Office of Cultural Studies, 2002.

27- Arabi, M., Mousavi Nodoshani, S., “Technology strategy", Tehran, Mahkame Publications, 2010.

28-  Fiegenbaum, A. Hart, S. & Schendel, D.”Strategic reference point theory” Strategic Management Journal, 17, pp.219-235, 1996.

29- Bamberger, P. & Figenbaum, A. “The Role of Strategic Reference Points in Explaining the Nature and Consequences of Human Resource Strategy” Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1996.

30- Fiegenbaum, A. Howard, T.”Strategic Risk and Competitive Advantage: an integrative perspective” European Management Review, 2004.

31- Quinn, R.E. and Rohrbaugh, J. “A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Towards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis” Management Science, 29(3), pp. 363-377, 1983.

32- Phaal, R. Farrukh, C.J.P. and Probert, D.R.”Technology Management Process Assessment: A Case Study” International Journal of Operation & Production Management, 21(8), 2001.

33- Ford, D. Saren, M. "Technology    Strategy for Business" Thomson Business Press, 1996.

34- Zegveld, M.A. “Corporate Strategy and Technology”, cited in: Verburg, R.M., Ortt, J.R. and Dicke, W.M. (Eds), (2006), Managing Technology and Innovation, Routledge, Oxon, pp. 209-227,2006.

35- Daft, Richard L.,”Organization Theory and Design”, 3th Edition, Tehran: Publications Office of Cultural Studies, 2001.

36- Hall, R.H. “Organization: structure, process and processes”, 2th Edition, Tehran: Publications Office of Cultural Studies, 2001.

37- Momeni, M. and Fal Qiyumi, A., “Statistical analysis using SPSS”,Tehran: Ketabe Now Publications, 2006.