Alic, J. (1999). Technology policies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Washington: Heinz center for science, economics and environment.
Bench, S., & Day, T. (2010). The user experience of critical care discharges:a meta-synthesis of qualitative research. international journal of nursing studies , 487-499.
Bikar, V., Capron, H., & Cincera, M. (2004). An Integrated Scheme for the Evaluation of Institution set-ups: The Case of the Belgian Regional Innovation system. Bruxelles: Association de Science Regionale De langue Francaise.
Bocher, M. (2012). A theoretical framework for explaining the choice of instruments in environmental policy. Forest Policy and Econimics, 14-22.
Boekholt, P., Cozzens, S., & Johnston, R. (2001). An international review of methods to measure relative effectiveness of technology policy instruments. Amsterdam- Netherlands: Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs (EZ).
Bromley, & Allan, D. (2004). Technology policy. Technology in society, 455-468.
Brukas, V., & Sallnas, O. (2012). Forest management plan as a policy instrument:Carrot, Stick or sermon. land use policy, 605-613.
Canter, U., & Pyka, A. (2001). Classifying technology policy from an evolutionary perspective. Research Policy, 759-775.
Clark, J., & Guy, K. (1997). Innovation and Competitiveness. London: Technopolis & Brighton.
Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks Ca: Sage.
De Bruijn, H. A., & Hufen, H. A. (1998). The Traditional approach to policy instruments. In G. B. Peters, & F. K. Van Nispen, Public Policy Instruments: Evaluating the Tools of Public Administration (pp. 14-33). cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Delkon, A., & Sobortini, S. (2012). innovation policies in SMEs. Milan: Center on Public Policy.
Dheensa, S., Metcalfe, A., & Williams, R. A. (2013). Men's expriences of antenatal screening: A metasynthesis of the qualitative research. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 121-133.
Dul, J., & Hak, T. (2008). Case Study Methodology in Business Research. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd.
Dunn, W. N. (1988). Methods of the Second type: coping with the Wilderness of conventional policy analysis. Policy Studies, 720-37.
Easterbrook, S., Yu, E., Aranda, J., Fan, Y., Horkoff, J., Leica, M., & Abdul Qadir, R. (2005). Do Viewpoints Lead to Better Conceptual Models? An Exploratory Case Study. 13Th IEEE International Conference on Requirement Engineering, 199-208.
Edquist, C., & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2012). Public Procurement for Innovation as mission-oriented Innovation Policy. Research Policy, 1757-1769.
Egmond, C., Jonkers, R., & Kok, G. (2006). one size fits all? Policy instruments should fit the segments of target group. Energy Policy, 3464-3474.
Group, S.-E. E. (2002). EU DG Research.
Gupta, S., & Tirpak, d. (2005). policies, Instruments and co-operatives arrangements. IPCC Fourth Assessment Report climate change.
Hassanzade, A., Namdarian, L., & Elahi, S. (2011). Developing a Framework for Evaluating service oriented architecture governance (SOAG). Knowledge-Based Systems, 716-730.
In't veld, R. J. (1993). The Dynamics of Educational Performance Indicators. International perspectives of regional Development and regional organization.
Johansson, B., Karlsson, C., & Backman, K. (2007). Innovation policy instruments. jonkoping international business school and royal institute of technology.
Kapsali, M. (2011). How to Implement Innovation Policies through Projects Successfully. Technovation, 615-626.
Leth, M., & Johnson, F. (2003). Selecting policy instruments to drive change in natural resource management. Victoria: Department of primary industries .
Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1989a). Implementation as a guide to policy formulation: A Question of When Rather than Whether. International Review of Administrative Science, 632-52.
Lockie, S. (2013). Market Instruments, ecosystem services, and property rights: Assumptions and conditions for sustained social and ecological benefits. Land use policy, 90-98.
McGuire, A., & Stuart, P. (1983). The Role of the Test Discount Rates in the NHS. Public policy and Adminstration, 11-22.
Meyer-Krahmer, F. (1987). Evaluating Innovation policies: The German Experience. Technovation, 317-330.
Montjoy, R. S., & O'Toole, L. J. (1990, August 30). Policy Instruments and politics: Multiple Regression and Intergovernmental Aid. paper presented at the annual meeting of the american political Science Association.
Mowery, D. (1989). Technology and the pursuit of economic Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
Mowery, D. C. (1995). The Practice of Technology Policy. In P. Stoneman, Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological change (pp. 513-557). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Nannen, V., & van den Bergh, J. (2010). Policy instruments for evolution of bounded rationality: Application to climate-energy problems. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 76-93.
Noblit, G., & Hare, R. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park: Sage.
Peters, G. B., & Van Nispen, F. K. (1998). Public Policy Instruments: Evaluating the Tools of Public Administration. cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Poister, H., & Streib, G. (1989). Management Tools in Municipal Governments: Trends over the past Decade. Public Administration Review, 240-48.
Ragwitz, M., Resch, G., Faber, T., & Huber, C. (2005). Monitoring and evaluation of policy instruments to support renewable electricity in EU member States. Karsruhe, Germany: Fraunhofer Institute Systems and Innovation Research .
Rennings, K., Koschel, H., Brockmann, K. L., & Kuhn, I. (1999). A regulatory framework for a policy of sustainability: Lessons from the neo-liberal school. Ecological Economics, 197-212.
Salamon, L., & Lund, M. (1989). Beyond Privatization. Washington DC: Urban Institute press.
Sandelowski, M., & Barros, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. springer publishing company.
Savas, E. S. (1987). Privatization: The Key to better Government . Chatham: Chatham House Publishers.
Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1990). Behavioral assumptions of policy tools. Journal of politics, 510-529.
Shrestha, R. K. (2001). The choice of environmental policy instruments under correlated uncertainty. Resource and Energy Economics, 175-185.
Tassey, G. (1985). The Technology Policy Experiment as a policy Research tool. Research Policy, 39-52.
Thain, C. (1985). The Education of the treasury: The medium-term financial strategy. public administration , 261-85.
Throne, s. (2009). The role of qualitative research within an evidence-based context: Can metasynthesis be the answer. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 569-575.
Weiss, G. (2000). Evaluation of policy instruments for protective forest management in Austria. forest policy and economics, 243-255.
Working Group on trade and transfer of Technology. (2002). A taxonomy on country experiences on international technology transfer. World trade organization.
Yin, R. K. (1984). Case Study Research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks Ca: Sage.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2nd, revised end). Thousand Oaks Ca: Sage.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3nd, revised end). Thousand Oaks Ca: Sage.
ازکیا, م., & توکلی, م. (1385). فراتحلیل مطالعات رضایت شغلی در سازمان های آموزشی. فصلنامه علوم اجتماعی, شماره 27 صص1-26.
باقری, ح., یغمایی, ف., & اشک تراب, ط. (1390). مفهوم شان بیمار و عوامل مرتبط با آن: یک مطالعه متا سنتز کیفی. فصلنامه دانش و تندرستی.
پناهی, ج., طبائیان, س. ک., & توسلی, ع. (1392). ارائه چارچوبی از سیاست های علم، فناوری و نوآوری از منظر عرضه، تقاضا و زیرساختی و ارائه پیشنهادهای سیاستی در بهبود نظام تقاضا. اولین همایش بین المللی تجاری سازی فناوری.
رفائی شیر پاک, خ., گوروگه, س., & چینی چیان, م. (1389). متاسنتز تحقیقات کیفی در علوم بهداشتی. مجله تخصصی اپیدمولوژی ایران, 51-57.
سانجایا, ل. (1385). سیاست فناوری و تشویق بازار. تهران: دفتر سیاست صنعتی، مرکز مطالعات تکنولوژی دانشگاه صنعتی شریف.
سرکیسیان, آ. (1384). سیاست تکنولوژی: اصول و مفاهیم. تهران: مرکز صنایع نوین.
سهرابی, ب., اعظمی, ا., & یزدانی, ح. (1390). آسیب شناسی پژوهش های انجام شده در زمینه مدیریت اسلامی با رویکرد فرا ترکیب. چشم انداز مدیریت دولتی, 9-24.
سیف الدین, ا., سلیمی, م., & سیداصفهانی, م. (1387). چالشهای پیش روی سیاستگذاری علم و فناوری. نشریه بین المللی مهندسی صنایع و مدیریت تولید دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران, 1-15.
طباطبائیان, س. ح., خالدی, آ., نقی زاده, ر., & نوروزی, ن. (1389). گزارش پایش جهانی توانمندی فناوری 2009. تهران: انجمن مدیریت فناوری.
قاضی نوری, س. س., & قاضی نوری, س. س. (1391). سیاست گذاری علم و فناوری در قالب سیاست های عام و خاص. رهیافت, 49-51 شماره 50.
قاضی نوری, س., & قاضی نوری, س. (1391). مقدمه ای بر سیاست گذاری علم، فناوری و نوآوری. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.
محمدی, ع., & بیگدلو, ن. (1391). ابزارهای حمایتی برای شرکت های دانش بنیان مستقر در پارک های علم و فناوری. رهیافت, 5-13.
هاولت, م., & رامش, ا. (1380). مطالعه خط مشی عمومی. (ع. منوریان, & ا. گلشن, مترجم) تهران: سازمان مدیریت و برنامه ریزی کشور.