مدیریت نوآوری

مدیریت نوآوری

معماری بوم‌سازگان همکاری در انتقال فناوری‌های پیچیده: رویکرد فراترکیب

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشکده مدیریت، اقتصاد و مهندسی پیشرفت، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، تهران، ایران.
2 استادیار دانشکده مدیریت اقتصاد و مهندسی پیشرفت/ دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران(نویسنده مسئول)
3 استادیار دانشکده مدیریت اقتصاد و مهندسی پیشرفت/ دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران.
10.22034/imj.2026.558313.2948
چکیده
انتقال فناوری سامانه‌های محصولات پیچیده به دلیل فراتر بودن از توانمندی‌های یک شرکت واحد، نیازمند بوم‌سازگان همکاری پیچیده است. هدف این پژوهش، شناسایی و تحلیل اجزا و مکانیسم‌های کلیدی «معماری بوم‌سازگان همکاری» به عنوان یکی از ابعاد حیاتی موفقیت در این فرآیند است. این مقاله با بهره‌گیری از روش فراترکیب (متا-سنتز کیفی)، به تحلیل عمیق ۳۰ مقاله تجربی معتبر (منتشر شده بین ۲۰۰۵ تا ۲۰۲۵) می‌پردازد که به مطالعه عوامل موفقیت در انتقال فناوری سامانه محصولات پیچیده در صنایع مختلفی چون هوافضا، انرژی و حمل‌ونقل ریلی پرداخته‌اند. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد که معماری بوم‌سازگان همکاری بر شش ستون اصلی استوار است: ۱) شکل‌دهی شبکه‌های چندذینفعی، ۲) مشارکت‌های استراتژیک فناورانه، ۳) همکاری دانشگاه و صنعت، ۴) توسعه و یکپارچه‌سازی تأمین‌کنندگان، ۵) روابط مبتنی بر اعتماد به عنوان زیرساخت نرم، و ۶) استراتژی‌های تعامل با ذینفعان محلی. این پژوهش با ارائه یک چارچوب یکپارچه برای درک مکانیسم‌های همکاری، فراتر از تحلیل‌های متمرکز بر شرکت یا دولت، تأکید می‌کند که موفقیت پایدار در انتقال فناوری سامانه محصولات پیچیده یک دستاورد بوم‌سازگانی است و نیازمند قابلیت‌های ویژه‌ای چون هم‌سازی یا میانداری بوم‌سازگان است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Architecture of collaborative ecosystems in the transfer of complex technologies (CoPS): A meta-synthesis approach

نویسندگان English

Hamed Ahmadi 1
amir zakery 2
Javad Mashayekh 3
1 Faculty of Management, Economics and Advanced Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Management, Economics and Advanced Engineering/Iran University of Science and Technology. Corresponding Author
3 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Management, Economics and Advanced Engineering/Iran University of Science and Technology
چکیده English

Technology transfer (TT) in Complex Product and Systems (CoPS) presents significant challenges, often exceeding the capabilities of individual firms and necessitating intricate collaborative ecosystems. This research aims to identify and analyze the key components and mechanisms constituting the "Collaborative Ecosystem Architecture," a critical dimension for success in this process. Employing a qualitative meta-synthesis methodology, this paper deeply analyzes 30 high-quality empirical studies published between 2005 and 2025, focusing on success factors in CoPS TT across various industries such as aerospace, energy, and rail transportation. Findings reveal that the collaborative ecosystem architecture is underpinned by six fundamental pillars: (1) Multi-stakeholder network formation, (2) Strategic technology partnerships, (3) University-industry collaboration, (4) Supplier development and integration, (5) Trust-based relationships (as the soft infrastructure), and (6) Local stakeholder engagement strategies. By providing an integrated framework for understanding these collaboration mechanisms, this study moves beyond firm-centric or state-centric analyses, emphasizing that sustainable success in CoPS’s technology transfer is fundamentally an ecosystem achievement and highlights the need for specific capabilities such as "Ecosystem Orchestration"

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Complex Product and Systems
CoPS
Technology Transfer
Innovation Ecosystem
Collaborative Architecture
Qualitative Meta-synthesis
بنی‌حسینی، علیرضا.، ذاکری، امیر.، و پیشوایی، میرسامان. (۱۴۰۲). واکاوی نقش میاندار تسهیل‌گر در شبکه ملی بهره‌وری ایران به منزله یک شبکه نوآوری. فصلنامه مدیریت توسعه فناوری، ۱۱(۱)، ۱۱۷-۱۵۳. https://doi.org/10.22104/JTDM.2024.6549.3238
مسگری، محمدعلی.، ذاکری، امیر.، و پیشوایی، میرسامان. (۱۴۰۰). ارائه مدلی به منظور ساختاردهی به قابلیتهای میانداری شبکه نوآوری در صنعت خودروی برقی ایران. نشریه علمی مدیریت نوآوری، ۱۰(۱)، ۱۵۹-۱۳۳. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.23225386.1399.9.4.1.5
موحد، علی.، ذاکری، امیر.، و نورعلیزاده، حمیدرضا. (۱۴۰۲). تحلیل نقش سرمایه‌گذاران خطرپذیر به عنوان میانداران شبکه‌های نوآوری. نشریه علمی مدیریت نوآوری، ۱۲(۲)، ۱۹۵-232. . https://doi.org/10.22034/imj.2024.375359.2672
Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84(4), 98-107.
Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451
Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306-333. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.821
Allen, T. J., & Cohen, S. I. (1969). Information flow in research and development laboratories. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14(1), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391357
Amann, D. (2022). Changing Path and Curbing Cost Escalation: Lessons Learnt from the Gripen Case. Defence and Peace Economics, 33(4), 421-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2020.1870310
Bak, K., Dobrow, M. J., & Hodgson, D. C. (2011). Factors affecting the implementation of complex and evolving technologies: multiple case study of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in Ontario, Canada. BMC Health Services Research, 11(1), 178. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-178
Baraldi, E. (2009). User-Related Complexity Dimensions of Complex Products and Systems (CoPS): A Case of Implementing an ERP System. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(01), 19-45. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919609002200
Bennani, F. Z., Metwalli, O., Dakkak, B., Dinar, B., & Benjouind, Z. (2025). Impact of Firm Linkages on Technology Transfer: Case of the Moroccan Aerospace Sector. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 73(2), 214-223. https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V73I2P118
Bezuidenhout, S., & Bean, W. L. (2022). A case study on inter-organisational technology transfer in the defence industry. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 15(1), 48-78. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGOSS-10-2020-0058
Blumer, H. (1954). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Prentice-Hall.
Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991-1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063_03_00087-4
Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1996). Co-opetition. Doubleday.
Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A., & Pavitt, K. (2001). Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More Than They Make? Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 597-621. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094825
Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349-399. https://doi.org/10.1086/421787
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press.
Choung, J.-Y., & Hwang, H.-R. (2007). Developing the complex system in Korea: the case study of TDX and CDMA telecom system. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 1(2), 204. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtlid.2007.015404
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
Conable, J. (2024). Innovation Transfer: Lessons from East Asian Technological Dynamism for Nigeria’s Economic Development. ScienceOpen. https://doi.org/10.14293/pr2199.000675.v1
Davies, A., & Hobday, M. (2005). The Business of Projects: Managing Innovation in Complex Products and Systems (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511493294
Dhanaraj, C., & Parkhe, A. (2006). Orchestrating Innovation Networks. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 659-669. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.21318923
Eggers, J. E., Hofman, E., Schiele, H., & Holschbach, E. (2017). Identifying the “Right” Supplier for Module Developments — A Cross-Industrial Case Analysis. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(03), 1750026. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919617500268
Eslami, M. H., & Lakemond, N. (2016). Internal Integration in Complex Collaborative Product Development Projects. International Journal of Innovation Management, 20(01), 1650008. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919616500080
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge-Based Economic Development. EASST Review, 14(1), 11-19.
França, J. A. (2019). The Coordination of Complex Product Systems Projects: A Case Study of an R&D Multi-Party Alliance. International Journal of Innovation Management, 23(03), 1950024. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919619500245
Galati, F., Bigliardi, B., Galati, R., & Petroni, G. (2021). Managing structural inter-organizational tensions in complex product systems projects: Lessons from the Metis case. Journal of Business Research, 129, 723-735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.044
Grabher, G. (1993). The weakness of strong ties: The lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area. In G. Grabher (Ed.), The embedded firm: On the socioeconomics of industrial networks (pp. 255-277). Routledge.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
Gregersen, C. T. T. (2022). Local learning and capability building through technology transfer: experiences from the Lake Turkana Wind Power project in Kenya. Innovation and Development, 12(2), 209-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2020.1858612
Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 293-317. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199804)19:4<293::AID-SMJ982>3.0.CO;2-M
Hagedoorn, J. (2002). Inter-firm R&D partnerships: An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy, 31(4), 477-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00120-2
Hagedoorn, J., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2000). Research partnerships. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 567-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00090-6
Hobday, M. (1998). Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation. Research Policy, 26(6), 689-710. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(97)00044-9
Hobday, M., Davies, A., & Prencipe, A. (2005). System integration: a core capability of modern corporation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(6), 1109-1143. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth080
Ivarsson, I., & Alvstam, C. G. (2005). The Effect of Spatial Proximity on Technology Transfer from TNCs to Local Suppliers in Developing Countries: The Case of AB Volvo in Asia and Latin America. Economic Geography, 81(1), 83-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2005.tb00256.x
Kiamehr, M., Hobday, M., & Hamedi, M. (2015). Latecomer firm strategies in complex product systems (CoPS): The case of Iran’s thermal electricity generation systems. Research Policy, 44(6), 1240-1251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.02.005
Kim, B., Cho, Y., & Yang, M. G. (2022). Technology Acquisition Strategy: A Latecomer’s Perspective on Integrating Component Suppliers With System Integrators. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(6), 2572-2587. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2947698
Krause, D. R., Handfield, R. B., & Tyler, B. B. (2007). The relationships between supplier development, commitment, social capital accumulation and performance improvement. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 528-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.05.007
Lakemond, N., Holmberg, G., & Pettersson, A. (2024). Digital Transformation in Complex Systems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 192-204. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3118203
Lee, J. J., & Yoon, H. (2015). A comparative study of technological learning and organizational capability development in complex products systems: Distinctive paths of three latecomers in military aircraft industry. Research Policy, 44(7), 1296-1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.03.007
Lin, Y., Qin, Y., & Xie, Z. (2021). Does foreign technology transfer spur domestic innovation? Evidence from the high-speed rail sector in China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 49(1), 212-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2020.08.004
Magnusson, T., & Johansson, G. (2008). Managing internal technology transfer in complex product development. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(3), 349-365. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060810889008
Majidpour, M. (2016). Technological catch-up in complex product systems. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 41, 92-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2016.07.003
Mazzucato, M. (2013). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector myths. Anthem Press.
Miguel, P. A. C., & Prieto, E. (2010). An analysis of transferring value-added activities within the context of modular design. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 10(4), 378. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJATM.2010.035647
Mohammadi, N., Heidary Dahooie, J., & Khajevand, M. (2023). A hybrid approach for identifying and prioritizing critical success factors in technology transfer projects (case study: diesel locomotive manufacturing). Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 21(5), 1389-1413. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-07-2021-0345
Moody, J. B., & Dodgson, M. (2006). Managing Complex Collaborative Projects: Lessons from the Development of a New Satellite. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(5), 567-588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-9059-y
Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75-86.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press.
Oshri, I., & Newell, S. (2005). Component sharing in complex products and systems: Challenges, solutions, and practical implications. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(4), 509-521. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2005.857568
Park, T.-Y. (2013). How a latecomer succeeded in a complex product system industry: three case studies in the Korean telecommunication systems. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(2), 363-396. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dts014
Park, T.-Y., & Kim, J.-Y. (2014). The capabilities required for being successful in complex product systems: case study of Korean e-government. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 22(2), 268-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2014.973166
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116-145. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393988
Ren, Y.-T., & Yeo, K.-T. (2006). Research challenges on complex product systems (CoPS) innovation. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, 23(6), 519-529. https://doi.org/10.1080/10170660609509348
Roscoe, S., Ahmed, A., Lycett, M., & Janbaz, A. (2023). Transitioning additive manufacturing from rapid prototyping to high‐volume production: A case study from the aerospace industry. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 67, 101725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2023.101725
Safdari Ranjbar, M., Ghazinoori, S., & Manteghi, M. (2022). Evolution of Iran’s gas turbine sectoral innovation system as a complex product system (CoPS). African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 14(4), 1102-1116. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2021.1936888
Safdari Ranjbar, M., Park, T.-Y., Ghazinoori, S., & Manteghi, M. (2019). Multi-level drivers of catching up in complex product systems: an Iranian gas turbine producer. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 11(1), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-09-2018-0090
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer Publishing Company.
Soltanzadeh, J., Rahmani, S., & Majidpour, M. (2024). Technological catch-up in the Iranian steel industry: Integrating regime-based and complex product systems approaches. Resources Policy, 89, 104601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104601
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Tushman, M. L., & Katz, R. (1980). External communication and project performance: An investigation into the role of gatekeepers. Management Science, 26(11), 1071-1085. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.26.11.1071
Wang, J., Du, F., Wu, M., & Liu, W. (2021). Embedded technology transfer from an institution and culture nexus perspective: Experiences from the Mombasa-Nairobi Standard-Gauge Railway. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 31(5), 681-698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-021-1865-5
Yang, Z., Qi, L., Li, X., & Wang, T. (2022). How Does Successful Catch-Up Occur in Complex Products and Systems from the Innovation Ecosystem Perspective? A Case of China’s High-Speed Railway. Sustainability, 14(13), 7930. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137930
Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9(2), 141-159. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.2.141

  • تاریخ دریافت 17 شهریور 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 29 مهر 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 11 آذر 1404